Limiting Access To ‘Payday Loans’
By The IntelligencerPointing out that Ohio legislators may be going too far in their campaign to sock it to “payday lenders” simply isn’t politically correct. After all, those offering short-term loans at interest rates sometimes as high as 391 percent are not very popular.
That makes them an easy target for politicians who know that many of their constituents slept through economics classes in school. Cracking down on a business viewed by many as little better than loan sharking is a near-certain method of making voters grateful.
But payday lenders — while victimizing some Ohioans in a vicious cycle of high-interest rate debt — do provide a service to some. They provide credit to those whose circumstances make it difficult or impossible for them to obtain bank loans or credit cards.
Eager to win plaudits for acting decisively to rein in payday lenders, members of the Ohio House of Representatives have passed a bill calling for severe limits. The measure is pending in the state Senate.
Just how severe? The House bill would place a 28 percent interest cap on short-term loans from payday lenders.
Put that into perspective: Credit card companies can and often do charge higher interest rates. And they don’t deal with shaky-credit customers of the type served by payday lenders.
Lobbyists for the payday lending industry have suggested that the Senate ought to agree to allow them to charge fees in addition to interest. That proposal has not aroused much interest.
One reason payday lenders charge high interest rates is that their customers are less credit-worthy than many other Ohioans. That means the lenders take greater risks in giving their customers money that may never be paid back. Without the incentive of interest rates at certain levels, the lenders will merely stop providing loans to some people.
We don’t expect state senators to take that into account. Again, they are more interested in pleasing voters than in enacting reasonable limits on payday lenders — perhaps capping their interest rates, but at higher levels than the 28 percent in the House bill.
If that limit becomes law, however, it undoubtedly will dry up a source of credit on which some Buckeye State residents depend. Bank on it.
|
JustMyOpinion
|
|
|---|---|
|
05-29-08 3:08 PM
|
An overdraft is not considered a loan and that is why they do not have to provide an APR. A person who balances their checkbook regularly, will know at the time that they write a check, how much their available balance is and if writing that check will cause their account to be overdrawn. If they choose to write that check then they have chose to pay that fee. They know that there is a fee and the amount it will be because Banks are required to disclosure that fact. If they would rather go to a payday lender and pay their fee, that is their option and should remain their option. I would not consider a Bank a vampire bat though because they didnt make the person overdraw there account, and if it is not a normal occurance, usually will reimburse the fee.
|
|
Momof3
|
|
|
05-24-08 9:09 PM
|
Georgetwin~ Yes, that's what I was trying to say!
|
|
jaymore
|
|
|
05-22-08 3:01 PM
|
A $15 fee on a $100 loan is way less than the overdraft charge. In fact, even if you're overdrawn by $1, the average charge is $35. Imagine what the APR is on that! And banks DO NOT have to report that APR to customers. Talk about vampire bats!
|
|
PaydayLendingRep
|
|
|
05-21-08 3:07 PM
|
Governor Strickland needs to do the right thing for Ohio and veto HB 545. His veto would ensure that working families continue to have access to short term credit options and avoid devestating consequences for tens of thousands of Ohioans. The payday lending industry is extremely important to Ohio’s economy. Our businesses contribute $250 million to Ohio’s economy, employ 6,000 Ohioans to whom we pay nearly $173 million annually in salaries and benefits, we occupy a total of 1,600 locations, for which we pay $77 million annually in rent. The ripple effect our business has on the state’s economy is tremendous—all of which is at risk with the passage of HB 545.
|
|
Georgetwin
|
|
|
05-21-08 11:21 AM
|
26041mds. my post is on The Poll Question about Payday Lenders.
|
|
Georgetwin
|
|
|
05-21-08 10:38 AM
|
26041mds, I don’t think MO3 was saying folks in debt are stupid. If that is the case, all homeowners are morons. I think she was saying folks dumb enough to use these services are stupid. Like my post says, I did it ONCE and I was STUPID to do so!
|
|
26041mds
|
|
|
05-20-08 11:03 PM
|
Momof3: car payments, house payments, credit cards are all debt; does that make anyone who has any of these stupid? No, I'm not under a "payday lenders" trance but do have the others; just wondering if that makes me "stupid" because I have debt?
|
|
JustMyOpinion
|
|
|
05-19-08 1:24 PM
|
I agree if someone wants to use them, then let them, but make it so that Payday lenders are required to make their customers aware of what and how much they are paying back. Just like banks and Truth in Lending. I've never used one so I dont know if they currently have to do this or not.
|
|
frisbeewv
|
|
|
05-19-08 12:55 PM
|
I'm with mom. You don't _have_ to use a payday lender. They're in business to make money by lending money. If a customer is willing to pay 300% then let them. ...assuming they are made fully aware what they are expected to pay that is...
|
|
Momof3
|
|
|
05-19-08 11:21 AM
|
Why not let the people using these services decide if they want to use them or not?! If someone wants to be stupid and get themselves into debt, let them!
|
|
Georgetwin
|
|
|
05-19-08 10:25 AM
|
The difference between Payday Lenders and Vampire Bats is that one has wings.
|
|
thekth
|
|
|
05-19-08 9:35 AM
|
Why use logic, politicians don't care about that. They care about getting votes. They'll trample on personal liberties to do it. Politicians shouldn't even have the power to do this, something is wrong.
|







