Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Parade Games
  • Parade
  • Pirates Report
  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites
Top Headlines

IN THE BLACK: W.Va. Riding High on Coal Industry's Wave

By JOSELYN KING
POSTED: November 28, 2008

WHEELING - West Virginia Coal Association Vice President Chris Hamilton says the state's coal is helping to keep West Virginia economically afloat as most other states struggle financially during the current economic tumble.

Hamilton, a Wheeling native, predicts "moderate growth" for the coal industry in the future, and that Consol Energy will continue with plans for a coal to liquid plant - which he hopes still will be built in Marshall County.

"The mining and energy sectors are providing a cushion for the state where it comes to jobs and revenue," Hamilton said. "The industry will continue to keep the state from falling as drastically and quickly as the national economy is projected to do in the coming years."

He noted that West Virginia is among "the seven or eight states" that will end the year with a surplus, and that this was largely due to severance taxes paid by the coal industry.

The coal industry, itself, is taking a steady but cautious stance in the coming months, according to Hamilton.

"From our perspective, while we will not be hiring as many people in the next couple of years, we will experience moderate growth due to strong domestic and international demand for all forms of energy - particularly coal," he said. "A lot of the hiring is the result of filling vacancies within the industry."

The coal industry will be seeing much attrition as it replaces an aging work force, Hamilton commented.

"Mining is still considered nationally to be a high growth industry," he said.

Hamilton noted that a part-time tax was placed on the coal industry four years ago to pay down a deficit in the Workers' Compensation Fund in the state. That tax was to extend until at least 2020.

"But because of the high energy market and the high pricing for commodities, we are in the process of paying the debt off at an accelerated rate," he said. "It may be as early as 2012, but realistically, it could be a couple of years past that date."

Consol's Coal to Liquid Project

Hamilton said the West Virginia Coal Association will approach state officials next year about the state investing in coal to liquid technologies.

"We will ask the governor and the legislature to devote some state money - seed money - toward the development of this type of project in the state's boundaries," he said.

Hamilton said that as a Northern Panhandle native, he would like to see a coal to liquid plant built in Marshall County, but that it is up to the area's lawmakers to provide the leadership to bring it here.

Earlier this year, Consol proposed a CTL plant for Benwood, which it was to construct along with Synthesis Energy Systems Inc. SES has since pulled out of the $800 million project, and Consol is presently seeking another partner for the project.

Hamilton noted that Consol has "done a tremendous amount of analytic work to substantiate its investment" and that because of this the company remains committed to building a CTL plant.

"I don't think it's a question of whether it will happen.," he said. "The governor is committed, and Consol as an energy producing company is committed.

"If West Virginia is to ascend to that national center of commerce and energy then it must elevate its vigor and interest in developing plants."

The Obama

Administration

Hamilton believes President-elect Barack Obama's administration must utilize coal - as well as all other natural energy sources - as part of an overall national energy plan.

"Throughout the presidential campaign, there were a lot of mixed signals that came from the Obama and McCain campaigns," Hamilton said. "It seemed both had an appreciation of he coal industry, its relationship to the energy mix, and its importance to the national energy strategy."

But he wasn't as convinced either knew much about coal mining.

"Both maintained that carbon-free coal would have a place in their administration, but neither spoke much of extractive processes - or had much understanding of the work," Hamilton said.

He said that he looks forward to working with the Obama administration and a new secretary of energy.

"We have to focus on a diversification of our energy portfolio," Hamilton said. "We think demand for energy will be so great in coming decades that we will need every single BTU from every single source available - everything that can be generated by coal, nuclear, solar and windmill energy.

"Our energy needs are growing exponentially every year."

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-25 |26-50 |51-75 |76-100 |101-125 |126-150 |151-165 | Post a comment
doctor
12-05-08 8:27 PM
Oh, Oh.............LOL "Oh, Oh Mr. Blankenship: Bank of America Statement:

"Bank of America is particularly concerned about surface mining conducted through mountain top removal in locations such as central Appalachia. We therefore will phase out financing of companies whose predominant method of extracting coal is through mountain top removal. While we acknowledge that surface mining is economically efficient and creates jobs, it can be conducted in a way that minimizes environmental impacts in certain geographies"

doctor
12-05-08 6:28 PM
Robo, I already corrected you about your 1970's ice age assertion. Also, nothing has been scientifically proven wrong despite your rhetoric. The prevailing scientific view nationally and internationally is that anthropogenic climate change is a scientific fact. But, hey, keep cutting and pasting that denialist information from those blogs or email alerts, if it makes you feel better. Or, cherry pick some kind of a newspaper article as your proof. I'm surprised you consider yourself familiar with scientific methods, peer review.

doctor
12-05-08 6:25 PM
You listed a couple of scandals one regarding Sudan and the World Meteorlogical Association. You have yet to list one national or international professional scientific organization that supports your views.

Also, I don't see any professional peer reviewed scientific journal articles provided either.

robojock
12-05-08 12:49 AM
This is also not to say that I am not closed to climate change, but I believe that the jury is still out; 1. Several scientists in the 70's warned of an ice age, to the point that it was covered in schools. 2. First we heard global warming and when the science was scrutinized and failed, they changed the mantra to climate change. 3. Much of the data has been proven to be wrong, and possibly, improperly manipulated. 4. Global warming has, several times, been tied to sun activity. 5. Many of the scientific groups and colleges involved with global warming have been marred by scandals, including denying tenure, taking grants that support bad science, to the point of being sued. Even including Ivy League schools! 6. Global warming is now being tied to higher taxes, carbon credit scams (Al Gore), and extortion attempts by the UN. 7. Global warming has happened before, long before man and the Earth survived and thrived. 8. Many scientists are saying we don't have enough data.

robojock
12-05-08 12:17 AM
Are you absolutely clueless? I just listed numerous "organizations" that were corrupt, including crimes ranging from embezzlement to being accused of taking bribes in support of various topics. This is science? Including NASA, who frankly got busted using bad data, which I am sure was not an accident. Also listed are various scientists in those organizations that you listed who say "no way" to global warming. Lets look at the facts govern global warming.

doctor
12-04-08 7:33 PM
Robo, got one national or international professional scientific organization that supports your views?

How come?LOL

robojock
12-04-08 12:16 AM
Government-sponsored scientific research reflects the biases, preferences, and priorities of its leaders (Moran, 1998). The state uses science to further its social and political purposes.

robojock
12-03-08 11:49 PM
The World Meteorological Organization is being investigated by Swiss authorities over allegations of vote-buying in its election process. Swiss prosecuters are investigating whether delegates at the WMO received payments from former employee, Muhammad Hassan, to sway the outcome of the 2003 election. Hassan, a Sudanese national, served as chief of the fellowship program in WMO's training department and is suspected of stealing $3.5 million from the WMO. [1]

robojock
12-03-08 11:33 PM
“I don’t want to pick on Al Gore,” Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. “But there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we have to temper that with real data.”

robojock
12-03-08 11:26 PM
Three scientists with a more rational view to the doomsday hype were invited to appear on the panel and have now been uninvited as they do not dance to the drumbeat of disaster. There is a VIP section of the audience with loopy-left greens and social commentators. We have the Bulletin of the Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (BAMOS), which was in such a hurry to publish a critique of The Great Global Warming Swindle that it contains schoolboy howlers and a lack of logic intertwined with politics.

robojock
12-03-08 11:18 PM
The truth is, they can’t. How do I know? The Royal Meteorological Society’s International Journal of Climatology tested 22 climate models by feeding them historical data to see if they could predict present day climate. All 22 failed.

To make matters even more dire for the climate change crowd, even Science Daily did an article on global warming predictions just today. In what other profession can one be wrong the majority of the time and still keep receiving a paycheck? Not many in the private sector, I’m afraid.

robojock
12-03-08 11:16 PM
You mean these organizations?

robojock
12-03-08 11:15 PM
World Meteorological Society hit by fraud charges

Geneva, Switzerland (Tribune de Geneve, Fre) - The former chief auditor of the WMO (World Meteorological Organization), Maria Veiga, confirmed Wednesday that delegates from 30 countries received more than SFr3 million of SFr4.5m spent by a Sudanese director who is under investigation for fraud for having made payments to buy votes in 2003. Geneva’s public prosecutor Daniel Zappetti is investigating the case. Reuters reports that Michel Jarraud, who is seeking another term as secretary-general in elections next week, says he is "committed to full cooperation" in the case. He has been asked to appear as a witness.

robojock
12-03-08 11:10 PM
‘We [fellow skeptical scientists] talked mostly of work and upcoming papers and went through the standard ritual of griping about journal editors and the ridiculous hoops we sometimes have to jump through to get papers published. But some of the guys had absolute horror stories of what happened to them when they tried getting papers published that explored non-‘consensus’ views. Really outrageous and unethical behavior on the parts of some editors. I was shocked,’ wrote conference participant Dr. William M. Briggs, a climate statistician who serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review, on his blog on March 4.

robojock
12-03-08 11:07 PM
And all of them are get grant money and whose scientists are threatened with tenure detraction. Give me a break. Science is supposed to be an objective task. In this case it is not. Show me science that has not received funding from government resources and anti-fossil fuel groups and I'll believe, and show me statistics not manipulated, I'll believe. sorry I haven't seen it yet, nor has the public.

doctor
12-03-08 9:30 PM
Robo, So what national or international professional scientific organizations support your views?

doctor
12-03-08 9:25 PM
Robo, OK Buckaroo continued......... American Meteorological Association-----want more?

doctor
12-03-08 9:23 PM
Robo, OK Buckaroo continued.......... American Meteorological Society Royal Meteorological Society (UK) Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences International Union for Quaternary Research American Quaternary Association Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics European Geosciences Union Canadian Federation of Earth Sciences Geological Society of America American Geophysical Union American Astronomical Society American Institute of Physics American Physical Society American Chemical Society American Society for Microbiology Institute of Biology (UK World Federation of Public Health Associations American College of Preventive Medicine American Medical Association American Public Health Association American Statistical Association Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers )

doctor
12-03-08 9:11 PM
Robo, Ok Buckaroo: Joint science academies' statement 2008 InterAcademy Council International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences European Academy of Sciences and Arts Network of African Science Academies National Research Council (US) European Science Foundation American Association for the Advancement of Science Federation of American Scientists World Meteorological Organization Will be continued above

robojock
12-03-08 7:22 PM
3 June 08 - The Army is weighing in on the global warming debate, claiming that climate change is not man-made. Dr. Bruce West, , with the Army Research Office, argues that "changes in the earth’s average surface temperature are directly linked to ... the short-term statistical fluctuations in the Sun’s irradiance and the longer-term solar cycles."

In an advisory to bloggers entitled "Global Warming: Fact of Fiction [sic]," an Army public affairs official promoted a conference call with West about "the causes of global warming, and how it may not be caused by the common indicates [sic] some scientists and the media are indicating."

In the March, 2008 issue of Physics Today, West, the chief scientist of the Army Research Office's mathematical and information science directorate, , wrote that "the Sun’s turbulent dynamics" are linked with the Earth's complex ecosystem. These connections are what is heating up the planet.

robojock
12-03-08 7:21 PM
?

29 Jun 08 - Excerpt: "Recent warming trends are very modest, and well within the range of natural variation. Predictions of future warming are based on speculative computer models whose accuracy cannot be evaluated or even tested. Sea ice in the Southern Hemisphere is at the highest level since satellite monitoring began in 1979. Last summer there was record low snowmelt in Antarctica. During April this year, 1,185 new all-time record low temperatures were recorded at U.S. weather stations.

"Given these facts, it is difficult to see how global warming can be real, or how we can be in the middle of a "climate crisis." But when these data are related to environmentalists, there is no sense of relief. Instead, it makes them angry that they might be deprived of their primary excuse to make war on civilization.

"Global warming is a fraud and a hysterical scare tactic."

By Dr. David Deming, a geophysicist and associate professor

robojock
12-03-08 7:18 PM
'Hogwash' - Climatologist (Easily) Smacks Down Gore's Climate Claims 24 Jul 08 - By Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, a former Virginia State Climatologist, a UN IPCC reviewer, and University of Virginia professor of environmental sciences and author of numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies on climate change.

robojock
12-03-08 7:17 PM
Chemist declares himself a ‘skeptic’ Jun 08 - Chemist Dr. Kenneth Rundt, a bio-molecule researcher and formerly a research assistant and teacher at Abo Akademi University in Finland, declares his global warming dissent.

robojock
12-03-08 7:16 PM
Award-Winning NASA Astronaut says global warming scare a political tool - 17 Nov 08 - Award-Winning NASA Astronaut, Moonwalker and Geologist Dr. Jack Schmitt: You know as well as I, the "global warming scare" is being used as a political tool to increase government control over American lives, incomes and decision making."

robojock
12-03-08 7:14 PM
"The same individuals who are doing primary research in the role of humans on the climate system are then permitted to lead the [IPCC] assessment! There should be an outcry on this obvious conflict of interest, but to date either few recognize this conflict, or see that since the recommendations of the IPCC fit their policy and political agenda, they chose to ignore this conflict. In either case, scientific rigor has been sacrificed and poor policy and political decisions will inevitably follow," Pielke explained.

He added: "We need recognition among the scientific community, the media, and policymakers that the IPCC process is obviously a real conflict of interest, and this has resulted in a significantly flawed report."

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries