quoted on this blog: "Tom Acker kept a pet dog and would walk this dog at night in an attempt to peek in girls' dorm windows!"----

Judy Jones, SNAP Director Ohio Valley, 636-433-2511---- "Survivor Network of those Abused by Priets"

Guess which VP was in charge of the NTTC for the NASA grant?? It was the VP for Sponsored Programs, Governmental Relations & Legal Advisor?? And who exactly was that???? YES, YOU GUESSED!! Davitt McAteer!!!! So the fox is now IN CHARGE of the whole hen house. And to those of you who are impugning Julio Giullietti's good name - get a grip. He is a good priest, who broke no rules, he is no heretic, who has not been dipping into the coffers. He can sue because this will be an EEOC case and, trust me, there are a bunch of folks who are going to come to Giullietti's defense. No, this was a propped up kangaroo court, not sure if it is Jesuit-led or not (I do not ever recollect Jesuit university BofT being made up of only Jesuits, but I could be wrong in the case oif WJU), to get Julio out before his time and this NASA thing was the perfect excuse.

"Specifically, for three WJU staff members, labor costs were included in two different areas of the proposal—100 percent of their salaries as individual staff members with specific responsibilities; and an additional 5 percent for two of the staff members and 35 percent for the other for “CET Management.” Although the three individuals have dual roles within WJU, the grants officers should not have accepted WJU’s proposal to charge more than 100 percent of their salaries to the NASA agreement."

Translation: poor oversight, or a knowledge of the problem and an inappropriate response.

From www hq nasa gov dated August 3, from an audit by the Office of Inspector General.

FROM THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

"We found that NASA inappropriately approved, obligated, and partially expended more than $4 million of facility and administrative (F&A) costs2 because NASA grant officers in charge of the WJU agreements did not adequately review WJU’s cost proposals."

Doesn't Macateer, interim president, run NTTC?

I found most of the Jesuits to be intelligent, kind, friendly, open and interesting people. I had, and still have, a lot of respect for the Jesuits I knew. That said, TA was NOT a Jesuit. He wore the costume but that was only because he was related to the Devil, and nobody ever had the heart to tell him that Halloween only comes once per year.

I am not bashing the institution. I AM bashing the people who run it. The U has lost its' way. While the Jesuits at WJU at somewhat conservative, they are also, in many ways, blatant socialists. This reflects the socialist nature of the Jesuit order.

I never liked Tom Acker. I thought he was an arrogant, rude, obnoxious, snotty, sleazy pretend priest. He was certainly not a man of God. His nonstop kissing up to KKK Byrd was shameful. This man actually defended Byrd's votes in support of abortion by stating that Byrd wasn't actually voting FOR abortion. He compared Byrd's theft of pork dollars for WJU with Moses parting the Red Sea.

The females on the back side of Sara Tracy were warned by their RA's to keep their blinds drawn at all times, as Acker had a telescope in his office at CET. I think an apt nickname for him would be Peeping Tom.

This man's negatives FAR outweighed his positives. Eventually, even the Jesuits got tired of him and the U fired him.

Two things can be count on this site: Truth/Nancy bashing of morning editorials before 6AM, and Ellis (who I respect your intelligence in most other postings) laying the smackdown on WJU at every opportunity.

"Dr. Donald Hofreuter, a member of the WJU Board of Directors, said he was "sorry to learn of the action of the board of trustees with regard to the termination of Father Julio Giulietti."

Do you think this is some kind of conspiracy? There must be some reason that we may never know about and more than likley should not.